This better not be old.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:34 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhVvyu-MVwg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Page 1 of 1
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:50 pm
OLD
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:11 pm
Thats was funny. I love the way she was speaking to him as if she was his teacher. What a dumb fuck.
Dont like the video description though
"Then he is interviewed on the news and owns the news lady" Surely its the other way round?
Dont like the video description though
"Then he is interviewed on the news and owns the news lady" Surely its the other way round?
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:34 pm
PUNK!heavy_the_hobbit wrote:OLD
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:17 am
w00t w00t North Carolina > MassachusettsHankVenture wrote:PUNK!heavy_the_hobbit wrote:OLD
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:30 am
January 20, 2008 is old, from a certain point of view.
Hank, you will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
Hank, you will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:59 am
No. Something is old when everyone has seen it. That is my philosophy, and im sticking to it.S.COREA wrote:January 20, 2008 is old, from a certain point of view.
Hank, you will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:41 am
I think I was more supporting you for it not being old, claiming that old is a relative term.HankVenture wrote:No. Something is old when everyone has seen it. That is my philosophy, and im sticking to it.S.COREA wrote:January 20, 2008 is old, from a certain point of view.
Hank, you will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
Also, I did it to quote star wars.
Re: This better not be old.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:06 am
Ah! Then the impasse is non-existant!S.COREA wrote:I think I was more supporting you for it not being old, claiming that old is a relative term.HankVenture wrote:No. Something is old when everyone has seen it. That is my philosophy, and im sticking to it.S.COREA wrote:January 20, 2008 is old, from a certain point of view.
Hank, you will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
Also, I did it to quote star wars.